Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Affluent Investor | April 28, 2017

Scroll to top

Top

6 Comments

1776 2.0: The Front Lines Of The New Revolt

Off the books

Alexis de Tocqueville once said that the limits placed on the central power in the new world are different from the limits placed on national power in the old world. In the New World, the national government has jurisdiction in certain specific areas. It is prohibited by law and custom from transgressing the boundaries of its jurisdiction. In that sense its power is severely limited. But within those boundaries it is sovereign and almost completely beyond challenge. If something such as war or taxing power is deemed a ‘federal matter,’ challenges to that power, for example the Whiskey Rebellion, were historically rare and suppressed mercilessly when they did occur.

On the other hand, Tocqueville says, the Old World functioned quite differently. The monarchs tended to be in constant conflict with other political powers regarding proper jurisdiction. The crown and the aristocracy and the colonies and provinces were engaged in an eternal game of tug of war, with each citing their own interpretation of law and custom to attempt to limit the jurisdiction of the others. Tocqueville observed that the limits to the powers of the central government in that case were largely imposed by the practical limits of enforcement. If a province was too well armed, then they went unmolested. If the aristocracy had the armies to resist, then they resisted. If colonies were too far away or protected by seasonal factors, then they had greater liberty. The monarch could only rule what he had the power to take and to keep, whereas America at the time that Democracy In America was being written tended to respect federal authority even where federales were few and far between.

It seems to be that as the United States federal government and the Presidency in particular have gradually morphed into something more like a European monarchy, our attitude towards its sovereignty has shifted. Certainly no state or province or faction of the ruling class would dare to challenge the military might of the United States in a single act of open revolt. But as time goes on we challenge it in small acts of secret revolt. Violation, for example, of our draconian system of immigration laws has become quite common. How many appointees to the federal bench or to the office of Attorney General must be caught in nannygate scandals involving child care payments to illegal aliens made under the table before we get the fact that our governing class, even that part which is directly pledged to enforce the law, routinely ignore this law?

We recently had a Treasury secretary who cheated on his taxes. But he is not the only one. There are probably more people who buy goods and services via the internet and catalogues who don’t pay sales taxes than people who do. We’ve been rehabbing our 134-year-old home for several years now, and I can tell you, some subcontractors expect to be paid in cash under the table. We follow speed limits when we think they are being enforced only. Dads let their teenaged kids drink beer. People cross the state line to buy fireworks, or any good when the sales tax is lower. People on unemployment compensation stretch it out so they can work on their eBay business.

Retirees buy discount drugs from Canada. Families share prescription antibiotics with other family members for whom they have not been prescribed. A man with cancer smokes marijuana even though he doesn’t live in a medical marijuana state. When we are driving at night and we come to a T in the road with a stop sign and there is no one else around, we slow down and roll through the stop sign. We eschew seatbelt laws when we take short safe jaunts up the block. We let our kids do a little practice driving in the parking lot before they get their learners permit.

We don’t recycle every time they tell us to. We top off the gas tank even though they tell us not to. If they announce they are going to illegalize normal light bulbs, we buy more–not fewer–of them to stock up. If we think that gasoline will kill the poison ivy better than some biodegradable eco-approved watered down stuff, we use the gas. Even though certain states had anti-sodomy statutes on the books up until a handful of years ago, gay people had sex in their homes all the time, and did not give a thought to the ordinances.

Businesses split in half so as to be qualified for small business exemptions from federal regulation. Farmers look the other way when they hire day laborers who clearly are not citizens. Federal regulators write their regulations, and financiers change their form of organization in unforeseen ways to avoid the regulations, even ones they pushed for.

George Soros delists his hedge fund to avoid rules his beneficiaries wrote. Businesses treat many regulations as cost of business and just pay the fine rather than incur extreme costs. Factories and labs create commonsense workarounds to arbitrary OSHA regulations.

And most people have absolutely no moral compunction about any of these violations of either the spirit or letter of the law, because deep down they no longer believe that the law, especially the tax code, represents any compelling moral principle, nor do its dictates any longer seem to be fair. They don’t think their home state has earned taxes on the Amazon purchases or that it deserves any share of the mutually beneficial exchange between you and your dry wall guy.

I bet you can think of a few dozen more examples, and increasingly we’re all in business and in personal life thinking of more and more ways to game a system which we have less and less faith in.

It’s not civil disobedience that I’m talking about. It’s the opposite: Civil disobedience is meant to be noticed. It is a price paid in the hope of creating social change. What I’m talking about is not based on hope; in fact, it has given up much hope on social change. It thinks the government is a colossal amoeba twitching mindlessly in response to tiny pinpricks of pain from an endless army of micro-brained interest groups. The point is not to teach the amoeba nor to guide it, but simply to stay away from the lethal stupidity of its pseudopods.

The amoeba does not get smarter but it does get hungrier and bigger. On the other hand, we get smarter. More and more of our life takes place outside of the amoeba’s reach: in the privacy of our own homes, in capital accounts in other nations, or in the fastest growing amoeba avoidance zone ever created, cyberspace. We revolt decision by decision, transaction by transaction, because we believe deep down that most of what government tells us to do is, at bottom, illegitimate.

 

Article originally published on Forbes.com.

Jerry Bowyer is a Forbes contributor, contributing editor of AffluentInvestor.com, and Senior Fellow in Business Economics at The Center for Cultural Leadership.

Jerry has compiled an impressive record as a leading thinker in finance and economics. He worked as an auditor and a tax consultant with Arthur Anderson, as Vice President of the Beechwood Company which is the family office associated with Federated Investors, and has consulted in various privatization efforts for Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. He founded the influential economic think tank, the Allegheny Institute, and has lectured extensively at universities, businesses and civic groups.

Jerry has been a member of three investment committees, among which is Benchmark Financial, Pittsburgh’s largest financial services firm. Jerry had been a regular commentator on Fox Business News and Fox News. He was formerly a CNBC Contributor, has guest-hosted “The Kudlow Report”, and has written for CNBC.com, National Review Online, and The Wall Street Journal, as well as many other publications. He is the author of The Bush Boom and more recently The Free Market Capitalist’s Survival Guide, published by HarperCollins. Jerry is the President of Bowyer Research.

Jerry consulted extensively with the Bush White House on matters pertaining to the recent economic crisis. He has been quoted in the New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Forbes Magazine, The International Herald Tribune and various local newspapers. He has been a contributing editor of National Review Online, The New York Sun and Townhall Magazine. Jerry has hosted daily radio and TV programs and was one of the founding members of WQED’s On-Q Friday Roundtable. He has guest-hosted the Bill Bennett radio program as well as radio programs in Chicago, Dallas and Los Angeles.

Jerry is the former host of WorldView, a nationally syndicated Sunday-morning political talk show created on the model of Meet The Press. On WorldView, Jerry interviewed distinguished guests including the Vice President, Treasury Secretary, HUD Secretary, former Secretary of Sate Condoleezza Rice, former Presidential Advisor Carl Rove, former Attorney General Edwin Meese and publisher Steve Forbes.

Jerry has taught social ethics at Ottawa Theological Hall, public policy at Saint Vincent’s College, and guest lectured at Carnegie Mellon’s graduate Heinz School of Public Policy. In 1997 Jerry gave the commencement address at his alma mater, Robert Morris University. He was the youngest speaker in the history of the school, and the school received more requests for transcripts of Jerry’s speech than at any other time in its 120-year history.

Jerry lives in Pennsylvania with his wife, Susan, and the youngest five of their seven children.

Become An Insider!

Sign up for Affluent Investor's free email newsletter and receive Jerry Bowyer's Special Report, "How to Be an Affluent Investor in the Age of Obama & Ineffectual Republican Opposition."



  • Joseph Mertens

    Learn to live without government at Freedomainradio.com

  • All we are seeing is the elites trying to maintain the illusions just while longer, as this corrupt and broken system dies a rather slow death !So we shall see much more insanity and angst as it all falls apart. There is a much better way to avoid all the chaos !

  • tom nogaro

    “More and more of our life takes place outside of the amoeba’s reach.”

    i would argue, respectfully, it is quite the opposite. witness:

    total control of our wallets and their dollars’ buying power by the fed, a private entity;

    invasion and usurpation of our and our progeny’s right to not be overburdened by tax to support the careers of lifetime politicians and their clients;

    intrusion into our native right to speak and teach and learn our language, english;

    physical body and unhealthy and perverse xray intrusion by the tsa at airports;

    intrusion into our constitutional right to dissent and to live without threat to our lives and freedom for our expression of same, at home and throughout the globe;

    fatca bank account financial intrusions, with mandated reporting and mutual fund trading exclusion for ex-patriots;

    intrusion into the homes we build via overbearing zoning and epa inspection laws;

    self-protective intrusion, via gun control and police registration;

    intrusion into our first amendment right to travel freely, even if monies are owed;

    nsa and epa intrusion into our thoughts, expressions, phone calls, writings, and bathrooms and light bulbs;

    intrusion into our right to confront those charging us with crime and a right to trial;

    intrusion into our powers and those of our states not given to the federal government;

    internet intrusion into our reading preferences by co-opted internet companies;

    social intrusion into our social conversations on the internet by co-opted computer and social network engines;

    recreational invasion, via police intrusive oversight of child lemonade stands;

    educative invasion, via sex education to babies in kindergarten;

    informational invasion by progressive ravaging and re-writing of our history in schools;

    intrusive power granted to quasi-governmental agents such as planned parenthood or meddling or angry neighbors to place wedges between us and our kids;

    familial invasion, via police and school administrators and teachers encouraging our kids at school to “rat out abusive” parents and relatives;

    statutory business intrusion, particularly those involved in food and beverage sales;

    nutritional intrusion, via illegalization of soft drink purchase and mandatory school lunch programs;

    military invasion of our lawful thought and overall lawfulness, by denominating in military training manuals those believing in the constitution as terrorists;

    manufacturing intrusions into auto size, fuel type, and safety mechanisms;

    airspace invasion by drone spy aircraft;

    intrusion into our right to decide not to purchase our own insurance or contraceptive devices to subsidize others’ decisions;

    body space intrusion and private medical records information intrusion, via zerocare;

    intrusion into our speech patterns, outlawing politically incorrect speech and words;

    intrusion into our religious and political beliefs by a rogue irs;

    contractual invasion, via co-opting our physicians’ duty of confidentiality;

    invasion at work by overzealous employers surveyng our sexual orientation and habits;

    geophysical privacy invasion with rfid chips in appliances, passports, credit cards, etc, and license plate travel detectors;

    encouragement of the international invasion of our borders by illegals and potential terrorists.

    etc.

    need i go on? do you have 2 or 3 weeks?

    • rivahmitch

      and, therein lies the problem. It’s time to refresh the tree of liberty. Semper Fi!

      • tom nogaro

        ty riv.

        we all need to take stock, be and remain vigilant, and vote for only those who will reverse this, irrespective of parties.

        this problem cuts across all lines. every single american is at risk, not left or right, every single one because the heritage and way of life they share and seek to hand down to their kids and grandkids is at risk.

  • John

    There is no moral compunction about any of these violations because they are not violations. The government was created to serve the population not rule the population. People have a natural instinct to insist on freedom. The people who should have a moral compunction about their violations are government officials who give themselves authority that wasn’t given to them and they were never meant to have. Also the military isn’t of the U.S. government, it is sworn to defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. Our government on the other hand has become the enemy of the people. A government that calls Christians, Tea Party members, and military veterans potential enemies of the State has become the enemy of the people. They feel threatened by Christians because Christians know our rights come from God, not the Government, They feel threatened by Tea Party members because they know the Government is violating the Constitution, They feel threatened by military veterans because they are trained professionals and have the skills to defeat the Government. We The People are the Government. The founders regarded all people in authority as ‘servants of the people’. Our servants have decided that they are now our rulers. Our Government is deliberately collapsing the economy and creating chaos so they can declare martial law and impose the new world government on everyone at gunpoint. Think about it. If the Government wasn’t running everything the economy would be thriving.

The Affluent Mix

Become An Insider!

Sign up for Affluent Investor's free email newsletter and receive Jerry Bowyer's Special Report, "How to Be an Affluent Investor in the Age of Obama & Ineffectual Republican Opposition."