Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Affluent Investor | April 29, 2017

Scroll to top

Top

6 Comments

Is God a Libertarian?
How the Bible Established a Country Without an Executive Branch

Ancient Egypt

Many Christian writers on economics claim that the Bible endorses neither capitalism nor socialism. They cut off the heads of both systems and install their own, often referred to as a “third way,” in which they scavenge through the carcasses for the best parts of each and stitch them together into a new creature. Unfortunately, the creature resembles an economic Frankenstein more than the good doctors care to admit.

Economic systems are nothing but laws concerning how people relate to each other about property. No society has ever existed without an economic system because the things we depend upon to survive are scarce, especially food, clothing, housing, and the land and resources needed to produce them. They are not like the air, of which everyone can have as much as they need. Because the necessities and pleasures of life are scarce, someone has to decide who controls them and uses them.

The form of government and the laws regarding property determine the economic system. God has declared in the Torah the government and economic system he prefers. What God prefers is also what is best for mankind. It will not only encourage godliness and peace, but economic prosperity as well.

The most striking thing about the Torah government is the degree to which it differs from that of ancient Egypt. Moses was raised in the pharaonic school and enjoyed an education in the Egyptian wisdom that awed the Greeks. The children of the pharaoh, nobility, and foreign vassals attended the boarding school that trained them in the knowledge and skills needed to run the country in the future while indoctrinating them in the worship of the pharaoh and Egyptian philosophy. The curriculum included reading and writing in the Egyptian language and Babylonian cuneiform, mathematics, music, and military strategy. It’s likely that Moses lived and went to school with the pharaoh who reigned during the exodus and died in the Red Sea.

Egypt was a theocratic dictatorship. Pharaoh was not only king but a god and the single representative on earth of all the gods. He owned all of the wealth of Egypt, though he allowed citizens to use it. The bureaucracy was overbearing and expensive, as might be expected for projects as massive as the building of the pyramids. Today, the nation most like ancient Egypt might be North Korea where the supreme leader is virtually worshiped.

Moses could have taken advantage of his training to create the Israeli government in the image of Egypt. But, Israel couldn’t have been more different. It had no king, pharaoh, Caesar, president, nor dictator. In other words, it had no executive branch except during war when the judges acted as supreme commander of the volunteer army. After the army had achieved victory, that leader usually became the chief justice and the army disbanded.

When there was no prime minister, and there were no bureaucracies, cabinet heads, or ministers of trade, roads, defense, agriculture, health, environment or the hundreds of other agencies that multiply and clog the machinery of modern governments. Israel had no standing army, police, pentagon, FBI, ATF, NSA, CIA or any other of the alphabet soups of agencies. So Israelis didn’t pay taxes to fund an oppressive executive branch as did ancient Egyptians and US citizens today. Family members performed the police work of catching criminals while service in the military was voluntary, except for peer and family pressure.

The Israel created by God had no legislature. Egypt’s legislative powers resided with the pharaoh as a god. God retained Israel’s legislative authority and only he could make or change laws. He gave the first law to Moses on Mount Sinai and again after the 40 years of wilderness wanderings just before Moses died and Joshua led the nation to conquer Canaan. The second issue of the law contained some minor additions and changes to the first, but from that point on no man could add to or subtract from the law. Moses needed to be a prophet as well as a judge in order for God to give Israel his laws, but he was unique even in that respect because no other prophet in Israel’s history added to the God-given law. One of the most important jobs of the priesthood was to teach the people God’s laws.

 

Become An Insider!

Sign up for Affluent Investor's free email newsletter and receive Jerry Bowyer's Special Report, "How to Be an Affluent Investor in the Age of Obama & Ineffectual Republican Opposition."



  • b glad

    Nice story , but not much reality to it. God was the executive of the Israelite people. When they obeyed Him all was well, When they rebelled, not so good. The problem today is we have too many people who think they are God. To answer your question, God is not a Libertarian. He’s God

    • Ruth

      My sentiments exactly.

    • In what way was God an executive over Israel that he wasn’t any other nation or isn’t over any nation today?

      For example, God punished Israel when society became evil enough, especially when it descended into human sacrifice, but which nation did God not punish for similar crimes? One of the main principles of the Bible is that God judges nations. Of course, he is very patient and often takes a long time to do it.

      Saying God was the executive of Israel in the same sense that pharaoh or kings were executives would require evidence of God’s daily performing miracles to enforce his laws. That didn’t happen. All God did was punish Israel as he punishes all nations. God was no more the executive of Israel than he was of Egypt, but no less, either.

      In addition, God almost always works through humans and he had no executives in ancient Israel to work through. For example, he had no police force or standing army. If God acted as an executive, he would have been arresting people who worshiped idols, but he didn’t. We find in Joshua a great deal of religious freedom.

      Also, if God was the executive of Israel under the judges, then he ceased to be so under the kings, yet in what way did God act like King David or Solomon under the judges? He simply did not act in that capacity. And he was just the same type of “executive” under the kings as he was in judges, which means he never was an executive like any executive on earth in history.

      • b glad

        God is the ultimate Benevolent Ruler, giving men choice and holding to the consequences of his actions. No one said God was an executive in the sense of the Pharaoh or the kings. All things are under His rule. That is true even today no matter what form of government men might employ. You seem to be arguing against yourself while proving my point.

        • You claimed God was the executive of Israel. If so, he was an executive like no other in history. In fact, his rule was so different that it makes the word “executive” meaningless.

          And if all that matters is that God rules all nations, as the Bible claims, then Israel’s government was no different than any other. So why was God upset when Israel demanded a king?

          That was God’s point to Samuel when he told God that the people demanded a king. Not having a human executive made a huge difference in how the people lived. God doesn’t oppress people, but human executives always and everywhere do.

          The fact is that God designed a government without a human executive or a human legislature. That makes the only government God ever designed a libertarian’s dream.

          The point of the article was how different God’s design of the government of Israel was from any other government that has ever existed. Even though most libertarian leaders are atheists or deists, the government they propose is hardly different from what God designed in the Torah.

          It’s clear from the Torah that God’s plan for mankind is a libertarian government. States, even democracies, are man’s faulty design, not God’s.

  • Ken Griffith

    You’ve just nailed the core flaw with the Reformation’s obsession with replacing kings with parliaments. A Christian country doesn’t need endless legislation. A well-written code of law should serve without constant tweaks. If you pay 450 men to write laws year after year they will surely forge a web of chains that the worst tyrant never had time to dream up.

The Affluent Mix

Become An Insider!

Sign up for Affluent Investor's free email newsletter and receive Jerry Bowyer's Special Report, "How to Be an Affluent Investor in the Age of Obama & Ineffectual Republican Opposition."