Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Affluent Christian Investor | December 13, 2017

Scroll to top

Top

No Comments

New Hampshire Was Terrible for the Establishment

Donald John Trump, Republican presidential candidate  (Photo by Gage Skidmore) (CC BY-SA) (Resized/Cropped)

Donald John Trump, Republican presidential candidate
(Photo by Gage Skidmore) (CC BY-SA) (Resized/Cropped)

The New Hampshire primary was a bad night for the Republican Establishment. Not because Trump got twice as many votes as the runner-up; that was expected for months. Nor because Ted Cruz slightly outperformed expectations. It was a bad night for the establishment because establishment candidates did well.

I’ve made it clear before that I think Marco Rubio is the only candidate acceptable to the establishment who can beat Trump and beat Clinton. I say “acceptable to the establishment” for two reasons: first, Cruz does have a non-marginal chance of beating Trump for the nomination, and has a decent shot against Clinton – especially if there’s a recession before November. But he’s clearly unacceptable to the establishment. Second, Rubio is, or should be, acceptable to the establishment, but he’s not establishment. On everything except immigration, Rubio is a genuine, fully committed conservative. Sites that rank candidates based on their positions consistently rank Rubio and Cruz as the most conservative, and Kasich and Christie – who has now dropped out – as the most moderate. Nevertheless, the media continues to label Rubio as an establishment candidate, lumping him in with Jeb, Kasich, and Christie.

The problem is, the actual establishment candidates did well; Kasich in particular, but Jeb also had a good night. This is bad for the establishment because it gives the donor class and establishment-aligned politicians incentive to continue financially support and roll out endorsements to candidates who are never going to win. There is some element of arrogance among the establishment class if they genuinely think they can make Jeb or Kasich the nominee.

The simple fact is if the establishment doesn’t want Trump or Cruz, they’re going to have to compromise and get behind Rubio. The base will never accept Jeb as the nominee. But they could, perhaps begrudgingly, accept Rubio.

If either Trump or Cruz eventually becomes the nominee, the mainstream media is going to view it as proof that the Republican Party is in disarray and needs to be dramatically reformed. The actual explanation would be more likely this: there were too many candidates who had egos too large to drop out in time for the party to coalesce around Rubio, “the conservative that can win,” and that the party leaders were too arrogant to realize that they couldn’t force another moderate like Romney or McCain.

Now it’s well within the realm of possibility for Rubio to place well in South Carolina and Nevada, while Jeb and Kasich have underwhelming or unremarkable performances. If that happens, Rubio is likely to be back on top and the endorsements and donations will pick back up. Nevertheless, the establishment is playing a dangerous game by continuing to back Jeb. The longer they do it, the more likely Republican Nominee Trump becomes.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

The Affluent Mix

Become An Insider!

Sign up for Affluent Investor's free email newsletter and receive a free copy of our report, "How the Trump Impeachment Crusade Costs you Money ."

Send this to a friend