Trump’s New York Win Not Enough to Unite Party

Empire State Building, New York City, New York
(Photo by mistress_f) (CC BY) (Resized/Cropped)
Trump and Clinton’s victories in New York are not surprising, nor do they represent a significant shift in the campaign. What they have demonstrated is that we are now in the stage of the campaign where most voters have already decided who they support. As a result, “momentum” no longer has a significant impact on vote share. The basic concept behind momentum is that a strong win in one state can produce favorable media coverage which then leads to an out-performance of polls in the next state. The principle being that undecided voters like to get behind winners, or whoever they see more of. Momentum had some impact earlier in the primaries, we’re now at the point where it appears that everyone’s mind is made up on which candidate they support. Polling has become more reliable as the percentage of voters that are undecided has shrunk. Both Ted Cruz and Bernie Sanders had a lot of “momentum” heading into New York, and they both underperformed their polling average.
On the surface, that seems better for Clinton and Trump. And it certainly is for Clinton. If nothing else, her massive win in New York effectively killed the Sanders campaign. Despite having outspent her 2-to-1 in ad-buys and having volunteers make over 3 million calls to potential voters, Sanders lost by 15%. Sanders has to win 88% of the remaining delegates to be the nominee. He’ll likely continue to run until at least the end of the month, but his chances of actually winning are in the single digits. Clinton doesn’t need to be expanding her appeal to win the nomination.
Trump, on the other hand, does. And his staff and advisors have finally convinced him of it. In his victory speech Tuesday night, he gloated slightly less than usual and didn’t insult anyone. He called Cruz “Senator Cruz,” not “Lyin’ Ted,” and Kasich “Governor Kasich.” It was probably the tamest post-vote speech of his since Iowa. In the two weeks preceding New York, there were no significant Trump controversies to speak of. The biggest news story surrounding him last week was an internal shake-up that reduced the role of his campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski. Trump has realized that he needs to be less controversial to unite the party, and changed his rhetoric as a result. The problem is, it’s probably too late.
In the same way that momentum is no longer relevant because of the ever-diminishing number of undecided voters, it’s constantly becoming harder for Trump to win over the people that don’t like him. Cruz’ shift in rhetoric, which I outlined in a column last week, has gone mostly unnoticed, but the changes in the image he’s presented are actually significant. Cruz has been forward looking the entire campaign – with exception to his “New York values” comment. Whenever he’s made controversial or hard-line statements, he’s always left enough ambiguity for him to reverse his statements without actually reversing them.
Trump, however, has not. His constant media attention, while certainly beneficial in the past, has effectively split the party into two camps: pro-Trump and anti-Trump. The pro-Trump camp represents 35-40% of the party as a whole. In order for Trump to secure the nomination early enough for him to unite the party, or to avoid a contested convention, he needs to change the opinion of a substantial portion of the anti-Trump vote. But he has not shown any signs that he can. His past statements have been too inflammatory for him to wiggle his way out of them. He wants to ban all Muslims from entering the country. There’s no ambiguity there, and no way for him to convince the rest of the party or the country that he doesn’t hold that position.
Trump is still the most likely candidate to win the nomination. There’s no disagreement there. But he has alienated so much of the rest of the party that if he does end up winning the nomination, he’s going to be running against Clinton with a significant portion of Republican electorate totally opposed to him.
Trending Now on Affluent Christian Investor
Sorry. No data so far.
The Affluent Mix
Biden Oblivious To Illegal Immigration Issues... August 2, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Rob Arnott On Bubbles, Inflation, And Once-In-A-Generation Investment Opportunit... August 2, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

The Federal Reserve’s Massive Theft Of Stability... August 2, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

What To Do About This Difficult Market? August 2, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Letter On The Politicization Of Corporations... July 26, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Peak Of The Fake Bull Market July 26, 2021 | Michael Pento

Woodrow Wilson’s Administrative State vs. Gold... July 26, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

Dividends, Energy, And Crypto July 26, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Whose Side Are You On? July 26, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Media, Left Ignore These Dangers July 19, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Mark Skousen On FreedomFest And How To Measure The Whole Economy... July 19, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Quantifying The Quantitative, Or Making Easy The Easing... July 19, 2021 | David Bahnsen

The Gold Standard Means A Rising Standard Of Living... July 19, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

Book Review: Brian Domitrovic Reveals The Monetary Genius Of Arthur Laffer... July 19, 2021 | John Tamny

Steve Forbes: Time To Worry About Inflation, Not Hyperinflation... July 12, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

UFOs Rescue Biden July 12, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Read This Classical Economist’s 200 Year Old Warning About Paper Money... July 12, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

How Central Banks Murdered The Markets July 12, 2021 | Michael Pento

Everything There Is To Know About The Stock Market... July 12, 2021 | David Bahnsen

AT&T CEO: We’re Ill Equipped For Politics, And We’re Spending A Lot Of ... July 6, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Internet Bias Distorts National Conversation... July 6, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

The Halfway Point Of 2021 July 6, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.