Bible is Pro-Nation, Anti-Empire

The Colosseum, Rome, Italy.
Following the Persian Wars, Europe adopted Middle-Eastern, Pagan idea of ‘Empire’ and suffered under competing empires: Greek, Roman, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Swedish, Austrian, Russian, British, German etc.
The Roman Catholic Church baptized the Pagan idea of Empire as “Christendom” – Christ’s Kingdom. Islam “sanctified” it as a divine concept of Caliphate. But Empire remained what it is – Pagan prescription for war. Instead of respecting property rights, Empire involves coveting other people’s lands. Instead of respecting God-given freedom, Empire makes people subjects.
‘Nation’ is God’s idea. God destroyed the imperial city of Babel to create nations (Genesis 11 & 10) All the residents of Babel were descendants of Noah. They were one people-group or ethnicity, speaking one language. God confused their languages and divided them into different territories, giving them the right to govern themselves, in their own languages. So, according to the Bible a ‘Nation is a Sovereign People Group, Governing Itself in its Own Language, in its own Territory.’
In Genesis 12, God called Abraham to follow Him, instead of following his cultural nationalism. God promised to make Abraham a Great Nation. ‘A Great Nation is many people-groups (tribes, castes, races) governing themselves in one territory in one or more languages.’ Israel was 13 tribes. What binds a Great Nation is not ethnicity but a common law, Constitution, or Covenant.
Europe accepted the Bible’s (Jewish/Protestant) idea of Nation (Great Nation) in 1648 during the Peace of Westphalia. That is when Holland and Switzerland became ‘nations’ independent of the Holy Roman Empire. The United States of America followed their example in 1776 and became a (Great) nation independent of Britain.
Britain was a confused nation. Anglicanism was a wholesale, top-down ‘conversion’ of Roman Catholics to Protestantism. They accepted some Protestant ideas, but brought Pagan Roman political outlook of ‘Empire’ with them. That outlook sustained British Imperialism in India. The biblical Christians, including Evangelical Anglicans, championed the idea of India as a nation. This was not an unconscious promotion of India as a great nation, but a deliberate decision that God had given South Asian territories to Britain in order to bless the geographic India to become a political, independent nation state of India. In my 1997 book, “India – The Grand Experiment” I have provided ample evidence of my case. Lord Macaulay successfully argued the evangelical case for India’s freedom in British Parliament in 1833. (Hindutva elements lie about his speech as condemnation of India.)
Macaulay’s brother-in-law, Charles Trevelyan, was straightforward in his 1838 book On the Education of The People of India that the purpose of giving Christian (English) education to India was to prepare a class of Indians who could govern India as a free nation. In India, Macaulay lived with his sister Hannah and Charles. (His father, Zachary Macaulay, was a prominent evangelical champion of liberty for African slaves. Although, in his later life, Lord Macaulay distanced himself from growing legalism and and Anti-intellectualism of the Evangelical movement.)
In the end it was American President, Franklin Roosevelt (Not Gandhi) who won for India and other colonies the right to “Self-Determination” in 1941, through the Atlantic Charter. He pressurized Britain’s Imperial Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, to end Imperialism/colonialism as a Pre-condition to America’s support for WW2. Gandhi’s 1942 call to “Quit India” was simply an echo of the sentiment of Christians from William Carey (the “Friend of India”) to Macaulay to Roosevelt.
Prof Vishal Mangalwadi directs the Centre for Human Resource Development in a Unversity in North India. He has authored 20 books and lectured in 40 countries. His exposition of Indian philosophy and Western thought and culture In books such as “The World of Gurus”, and “The Book That Made Your World: How the Bible Created the Soul of Western Civilization” are studied at university level.
Trending Now on Affluent Christian Investor
Sorry. No data so far.
The Affluent Mix
Biden Oblivious To Illegal Immigration Issues... August 2, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Rob Arnott On Bubbles, Inflation, And Once-In-A-Generation Investment Opportunit... August 2, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

The Federal Reserve’s Massive Theft Of Stability... August 2, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

What To Do About This Difficult Market? August 2, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Letter On The Politicization Of Corporations... July 26, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Peak Of The Fake Bull Market July 26, 2021 | Michael Pento

Woodrow Wilson’s Administrative State vs. Gold... July 26, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

Dividends, Energy, And Crypto July 26, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Whose Side Are You On? July 26, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Media, Left Ignore These Dangers July 19, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Mark Skousen On FreedomFest And How To Measure The Whole Economy... July 19, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Quantifying The Quantitative, Or Making Easy The Easing... July 19, 2021 | David Bahnsen

The Gold Standard Means A Rising Standard Of Living... July 19, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

Book Review: Brian Domitrovic Reveals The Monetary Genius Of Arthur Laffer... July 19, 2021 | John Tamny

Steve Forbes: Time To Worry About Inflation, Not Hyperinflation... July 12, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

UFOs Rescue Biden July 12, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Read This Classical Economist’s 200 Year Old Warning About Paper Money... July 12, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

How Central Banks Murdered The Markets July 12, 2021 | Michael Pento

Everything There Is To Know About The Stock Market... July 12, 2021 | David Bahnsen

AT&T CEO: We’re Ill Equipped For Politics, And We’re Spending A Lot Of ... July 6, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Internet Bias Distorts National Conversation... July 6, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

The Halfway Point Of 2021 July 6, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.