A Communist Intellectual Repents
Renowned academic Eugene Genovese, a leftist and former communist, in his 1994 article titled “The Question,” gives a clarion call to his fellow leftist to answer for the results of their history’s attempts to create a utopian society of equality and justice. Genovese writes, in a tongue-and-cheek, but serious manner, “in a noble effort to liberate the human race from violence and oppression we [liberals] broke all records for mass slaughter, piling up tens of millions of corpses in less than three-quarters of a century.” Dr. Genovese continues by siting that the left, or collectivists, have not, nor cannot, break free from their relentless pursuit of this illusion of their utopian society regardless of the body count left in their wake. “Especially amusing,” writes Genovese, “has been the spectacle of those who pronounce themselves anti-Stalinists and denounced the socialist countries at every turn and yet even today applaud each new revolution, although any damned fool has to know that most of them will end in the same place.” He goes on to squarely and succinctly summarize the sad and horrendous result and continued pattern of the socialist left:
Our justification began to look seedy when the grand liberation featured hideous political regimes under which no sane person would want to live. It became preposterous when our project ended in the ignominious collapse of the social system that was supposed to undergird a brave new world and justify the staggering sacrifice of human life.
As Austrian economist Friedrich Hayek points out, it is a removal of our individuality for the sake of the collective. Therefore, it, either intentionally or unintentionally, seeps into all aspects of our beliefs and values rather than just our lives; a removal or, at least, a separating from God and our individual relationship with Him. And how does this creep occur? Again, Hayek demonstrates, which is also prevalent today, that:
To be controlled in our economic pursuits means to be always controlled unless we declare our specific purpose. Or, since when we declare our specific purpose we shall also have to get it approved, we should really be controlled in everything…who decide[s] what is more, and what is less, important for us…we as individuals should no longer be allowed to decide what we regard as marginal…And whoever controls all economic activity controls means for all our ends and must therefore decide which are to be satisfied and which not.
As Eugene Genovese did, collectivists should repent their sins.
 Eugene D. Genovese, Summer 1994, “The Question,” Dissent magazine, p. 371.
 Eugene D. Genovese, Summer 1994, “The Question,” Dissent magazine, p. 372.
 Eugene D. Genovese, Summer 1994, “The Question,” Dissent magazine, p. 373.
 Friedrich A. von Hayek (Bruce Caldwell, Ed.), 2007 (originally published in 1944), The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents, (Routledge, London: The University of Chicago Press), p. 126.
Originally published on Townhall Finance.
Jim Huntzinger began his career as a manufacturing engineer with Aisin Seiki (a Toyota Group company and manufacturer of automotive components) when they transplanted to North America to support Toyota. Over his career he has also researched at length the evolution of manufacturing in the United States with an emphasis on lean’s influence and development. In addition to his research on TWI, he has extensively researched the history of Ford’s Highland Park plant and its direct tie to Toyota’s business model and methods of operation.
Huntzinger is the President and Founder of Lean Frontiers and a graduate from Purdue University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology and received a M.S. in Engineering Management from the Milwaukee School of Engineering. He authored the book, Lean Cost Management: Accounting for Lean by Establishing Flow, was a contributing author to Lean Accounting: Best Practices for Sustainable Integration.
Trending Now on Affluent Christian Investor
Sorry. No data so far.
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.