Government Officials Are Men, Not Gods And Should Punish Actions, Not Thoughts

Allegory of Justice by Bernardino Mei.
It would almost seem that government officials are becoming more and more convinced that they possess god-like powers.
It used to be that our rulers limited themselves to policing our actions, punishing evil-doers and securing a friendly environment for those doing good.
Now, as the Wizards of Washington have evolved into more heavenly beings, they feel qualified to judge our attitudes, our thoughts maybe even our hearts.
For instance, take the more than year-long court battle over the three Trump Travel Bans that just ended this summer.
Multiple times lesser courts threw the Travel Bans out because they insisted that Trump had made not-so-friendly campaign statements about Muslim terrorists and consequently the Bans were “tainted with animus”.
In other words, because Trump had a “bad” thought, his action was bad as well.
Of course, in the end, the Supreme Court correctly ruled that as nonsense – it didn’t matter what his attitude was, he had the authority to issue the Travel Ban if he thought it was in the security interest of America.
Unfortunately, four of the Supremes were of the minority opinion that the ‘animus’ behind the Ban made it unconstitutional.
How is possible that four of the supposedly best legal minds in the country could believe that an exercise of executive power could be unconstitutional based upon its motivation?
In other words, they think that the very same Travel Ban say, enacted by Obama who didn’t have any animus, would be constitutional but, since Trump has animus it is unconstitutional.
This is bizarre legal reasoning that is laughable.
This reasoning applied to the statutory power of the legislative branch would mandate the inquisition of the minds of every legislator to ascertain their attitudes when passing new laws.
Every law could be either constitutional or, unconstitutional depending upon the mental state of those that voted for it.
I can picture the scene now, “Ms. Pelosi, is there any chance that you possess some animus toward conservative Christian Americans and that is why you voted to open up the borders and allow millions of immigrants into the country who don’t share the same values as those citizens do?”
Or, historically, “President Roosevelt, we must rule the Declaration of War against Japan unconstitutional because you obviously have a hatred of Japan that motivated this action.”
Who will judge the minds of our legislators, each and every one of them, on each and every piece of legislation?
How can we be a nation of laws when laws are only legitimate if based on the ‘right’ motivations?
It would be chaos as we examine and interrogate all government officials to ferret out their true motives.
Laws and, executive actions, are based upon their intended effects and if they are within the reach of action as defined in the Constitution, they are legal and constitutional, regardless of the motives of the enactors.
Only those possessed of god-like powers can read minds and ascertain motivations.
It’s a risky business to try to do so and that’s why the law should only judge based upon objective data, not imaginative fancies about what others may or may not be thinking.
We are in a sorry state when some of our supposedly best legal thinkers think that it is their job to read minds and that they actually believe they can do so!
In the end, the judges who knocked down the Travel Ban were shown to be the ones ‘tainted by animus’.
Not towards Muslims but towards Trump.
If you think otherwise, I say that it just ‘taint so.
Terry Applegate writes from Utah in the winter and Michigan in the summer. He is CEO of Applegate Insulation, serves on the board for Citizens for Traditional Values, Cellulose Insulation Manufacturers Association and the European Theological Seminary and is married to Val with three children and four grand-children.
Trending Now on Affluent Christian Investor
Sorry. No data so far.
The Affluent Mix
Biden Oblivious To Illegal Immigration Issues... August 2, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Rob Arnott On Bubbles, Inflation, And Once-In-A-Generation Investment Opportunit... August 2, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

The Federal Reserve’s Massive Theft Of Stability... August 2, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

What To Do About This Difficult Market? August 2, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Letter On The Politicization Of Corporations... July 26, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Peak Of The Fake Bull Market July 26, 2021 | Michael Pento

Woodrow Wilson’s Administrative State vs. Gold... July 26, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

Dividends, Energy, And Crypto July 26, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Whose Side Are You On? July 26, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Media, Left Ignore These Dangers July 19, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Mark Skousen On FreedomFest And How To Measure The Whole Economy... July 19, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Quantifying The Quantitative, Or Making Easy The Easing... July 19, 2021 | David Bahnsen

The Gold Standard Means A Rising Standard Of Living... July 19, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

Book Review: Brian Domitrovic Reveals The Monetary Genius Of Arthur Laffer... July 19, 2021 | John Tamny

Steve Forbes: Time To Worry About Inflation, Not Hyperinflation... July 12, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

UFOs Rescue Biden July 12, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Read This Classical Economist’s 200 Year Old Warning About Paper Money... July 12, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

How Central Banks Murdered The Markets July 12, 2021 | Michael Pento

Everything There Is To Know About The Stock Market... July 12, 2021 | David Bahnsen

AT&T CEO: We’re Ill Equipped For Politics, And We’re Spending A Lot Of ... July 6, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Internet Bias Distorts National Conversation... July 6, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

The Halfway Point Of 2021 July 6, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.