Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Affluent Christian Investor | April 20, 2019

Scroll to top

Top

No Comments

Why Big Funds Overlook Places Like Columbus And Why They Shouldn’t

Columbus, Ohio.

A recent article in City Journal summarizes Columbus, Ohio’s job growth success:

“Nine years ago, when the Columbus Partnership, an organization of 65 Central Ohio CEOs, launched the Columbus 2020 initiative, which sought to add 150,000 new jobs to the regional economy in a decade, it seemed like an unreachable ambition. After all, during the 2000s, Columbus, like most of America, actually lost jobs. But Columbus met its goal early. During 2010–17, the region added nearly 164,000 new jobs, a 17.8 percent growth rate that ranks second among major metros in the Midwest—and far outpaced the national figure of 12.5 percent.”

City Journal is right, Columbus, Ohio has had some very good years lately. Population and job growth in the city have been significantly higher than in the rest of the country, so it’s no surprise that it was considered for a new Amazon headquarters. The real estate investment index that I worked on (PPTYX) has higher allocations in Columbus for both residential real estate and retail real estate than Schwab’s real estate investment index.

PPTYX also holds significantly higher allocations of retail investment than a cap-weighted approach:

On the surface, it makes sense to be overweight in Columbus. It has a much higher percentage of high-productivity workers than other cities, which is a great driver of property values:

Over .5% of people in Columbus are high-income, but in residential and retail the Schwab real estate index only has an average weighting of 0.21%. In other words, in this case, as in others, cap-weighting underweights a region relative to its growth drivers.

They also have a higher proportion of high-income people than other cities.

Columbus’ population has grown at a much higher rate than other comparable cities:

“Its metro-area population has grown by 172,000, or 9 percent, since 2010, tops in the Midwest among larger regions. It has added almost 400,000 people since 2000, putting it fewer than 25,000 behind the much-larger Chicago metro’s increase. The Columbus metropolitan area now exceeds 2 million people, and some demographers project that it will hit 3 million by 2050.”

Population growth is essential for economic growth, and we can see the fruits of that in Columbus’ high GDP per capita.

Ohio is bringing in more people than other cities, and the people they’re bringing in are disproportionately wealthier and more productive.

“Its limitations aside, Columbus is improving demographically, economically, and culturally. Except for Chicago, no midwestern city has cracked the code on how to attract newcomers from outside the region. There’s no reason that Columbus can’t be the breakout from the midwestern pack, making itself into a national, not just regional, success story.”

While celebrity cities that have high market capitalization aren’t doing so well, smaller cities like Columbus are turning into very profitable investments.

 

 

Originally published on Townhall Finance.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

The Affluent Mix

Become An Insider!

Sign up for Affluent Investor's free email newsletter and receive a free copy of our report, "How the Trump Impeachment Crusade Costs you Money ."

Send this to a friend