Why Countries Are Poor: Economic Parasites Are Bigger Than Hosts
For a wide swath of people, profit is a dirty word. For them, it is evidence that businesses expropriate the value of labor from their employees or cheat customers by charging prices higher than the costs of production. It is the view that all value comes from labor and that price should be determined only by cost. Such ideas are the foundation of socialism, and those ideas have been the prevailing political ideology of most developing countries for many decades.
On the other end of the scale, developed countries are those where markets are or have been free and open to competition and where business owners have been able to profit from their risk in investments, in time, money, or any other resources. The difference is stark. Even developed countries that have adopted some level of socialism in recent decades started from a high level that resulted from a market-based economy with profitable businesses. The prosperity was attained before the parasite attached to the host and not because the parasite caused progress.
The problem with perennially-poor countries is that the host hasn’t generated enough blood to spare for the parasite. They are not developing because there is not a high enough magnitude of profits to enable progress. In many cases there are cultural impediments, deep rooted envy or jealousy, tribalism that stifles or confiscates personal profits, or the lack of a rule of law, without which businesses and people without political connections cannot prosper. A young friend of mine finished his masters degree in business but has gotten a job with a United Nations Agency in his own country, Somalia, not because there is no opportunity there, but because there is a fairly high likelihood of getting robbed or murdered if you own a business. No amount of foreign aid will bring progress there.
Business competition is an exploration process. Some entrepreneurs try a process, product, or service that is not profitable,and they go out of business. They have discovered a system that doesn’t work. To the extent that they lose money, going out of business prevents the wasting of resources that could be put to more effective, efficient use in alternative enterprises. A profitable business demonstrates a process that does work, a system that creates more value than it consumes.
Further, the money that customers pay for goods or labor hours that employees are willing to trade for wages indicate that they value the goods, services, or money they get more than the resources they have to give up. If demand is high relative to the supply, the price will be relatively high, and the business will likely be profitable. A price less than the costs of production necessarily indicates that either demand for the product is low or there are too many suppliers. The lack of profits is the incentive to move resources to other markets or industries where profits are higher. The profits are effective signals about where to increase overall value for society most effectively.
High regard for property rights and the profits that stem from them is the fundamental difference between poor and prosperous countries. It is not surprising that there is a correlation between economic freedom and property rights and economic development. There is actually a causal relationship. Even employees in a market economy tend to migrate to profitable industries and businesses, because all wages are paid from productivity and profits. The more profitable industries and businesses in an economy, the higher the standard of living will be. If people in developing countries want to develop faster, the first step they need to take is to embrace profits, protect property rights, and encourage competition by limiting government’s interference on the economy.
Originally published on Townhall Finance.
Daniel J. McLaughlin is the author of “Compassion and Truth-Why Good Intentions Don’t Equal Good Results.” Formerly a finance executive, he is now focused primarily on writing on economics, business, and politics. You can find him at daniel-mclaughlin.com.
Trending Now on Affluent Christian Investor
Sorry. No data so far.
The Affluent Mix
Biden Oblivious To Illegal Immigration Issues... August 2, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Rob Arnott On Bubbles, Inflation, And Once-In-A-Generation Investment Opportunit... August 2, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

The Federal Reserve’s Massive Theft Of Stability... August 2, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

What To Do About This Difficult Market? August 2, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Letter On The Politicization Of Corporations... July 26, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Peak Of The Fake Bull Market July 26, 2021 | Michael Pento

Woodrow Wilson’s Administrative State vs. Gold... July 26, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

Dividends, Energy, And Crypto July 26, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Whose Side Are You On? July 26, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Media, Left Ignore These Dangers July 19, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Mark Skousen On FreedomFest And How To Measure The Whole Economy... July 19, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Quantifying The Quantitative, Or Making Easy The Easing... July 19, 2021 | David Bahnsen

The Gold Standard Means A Rising Standard Of Living... July 19, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

Book Review: Brian Domitrovic Reveals The Monetary Genius Of Arthur Laffer... July 19, 2021 | John Tamny

Steve Forbes: Time To Worry About Inflation, Not Hyperinflation... July 12, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

UFOs Rescue Biden July 12, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Read This Classical Economist’s 200 Year Old Warning About Paper Money... July 12, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

How Central Banks Murdered The Markets July 12, 2021 | Michael Pento

Everything There Is To Know About The Stock Market... July 12, 2021 | David Bahnsen

AT&T CEO: We’re Ill Equipped For Politics, And We’re Spending A Lot Of ... July 6, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Internet Bias Distorts National Conversation... July 6, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

The Halfway Point Of 2021 July 6, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.