Panic Doesn’t Suspend Economic Laws
Considering recent panic buying, it’s worthwhile considering, again, the phenomenon of rising prices in times of scarcity. The best analogy I have seen is from Professor Antony Davies: “Trying to battle a shortage by prohibiting prices from rising is no different than trying to battle the virus by prohibiting thermometers from registering more than 98.6 degrees. Both ignore the disease in favor of regulating the tool that measures the disease.”
In times of scarcity, prices rise. That is not an ideology or an apology for greedy capitalists. It is a statement of fact, a reflection of logical necessity. It does make it more difficult for buyers, especially low-income people, and provides the truly compassionate with the opportunity to reach into their own pockets to help. The laws of supply and demand, however, as with all economic laws, arise from the composition of human logic and the strict limitations of the physical world. The law of demand, simply stated, is that, as the price of a particular good or service decreases, the quantity of the item demanded increases. The law of supply is the opposite, that, as the price decreases, the quantity supplied decreases. The demand curve slopes downward to the right, the supply curve slopes upward. That is not just an empirical reality in particular situations, but is, rather, an unavoidable conclusion.
Empirical economists sometimes claim that they have found exceptions to the laws of economics, and thus, they are situational and not really laws. The grave error of many or most such economists, as well as others, is that they assume that price includes only money exchanged, and this affects many of their ideas and theories. Price in economic discussions is usually shown as money units only for convenience, because it is easier to get one’s head around, but price is really what is called “opportunity cost.”
Opportunity cost, a well known and widely used term in economics, means everything that must be given up to pursue one particular course of action. That includes emotional, psychological, and any other type of cost, measurable or non-measurable. Resources, including time, are absolutely limited for every individual, so in order to do one thing, you must necessarily not do something else. You give up the opportunity to do one thing to be able to do the other. We run into that phenomenon every day, every minute of our lives.
If, instead of using dollars, which misses a very large part of the decision-making process, you use opportunity cost in all of its forms, supply and demand are totally adequate to explain every circumstance of human interaction. They must be. There are no exceptions. They result from human intelligence and the reaction to absolute physical limitations of reality.
Every individual values any item to be exchanged differently from every other person, depending on present circumstances, assumptions about the future, what other people think, and so on. At any moment, some people will require a low price (opportunity cost) to induce them to exchange, while others are willing to exchange at even a high price (opportunity cost). It is a logical necessity that at lower prices, the number of people who value what they get more than what they have to give increases. The opposite occurs for supply. As price decreases, the number of people who value what they get more than what they give decreases. The market price is where the two meet. It is the market thermometer, the gauge of how well supply matches demand.
Shortages, i.e. empty shelves, occur when markets are not allowed to adjust to scarcity. Restricting the gauge, the thermometer, does not cure the disease. It masks it and often extends it and makes it worse. Let’s quit doing that.
This article originally appeared on Townhall Finance.
Daniel J. McLaughlin is the author of “Compassion and Truth-Why Good Intentions Don’t Equal Good Results.” Formerly a finance executive, he is now focused primarily on writing on economics, business, and politics. You can find him at daniel-mclaughlin.com.
Trending Now on Affluent Christian Investor
Sorry. No data so far.
The Affluent Mix
Biden Oblivious To Illegal Immigration Issues... August 2, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Rob Arnott On Bubbles, Inflation, And Once-In-A-Generation Investment Opportunit... August 2, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

The Federal Reserve’s Massive Theft Of Stability... August 2, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

What To Do About This Difficult Market? August 2, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Letter On The Politicization Of Corporations... July 26, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Peak Of The Fake Bull Market July 26, 2021 | Michael Pento

Woodrow Wilson’s Administrative State vs. Gold... July 26, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

Dividends, Energy, And Crypto July 26, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Whose Side Are You On? July 26, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Media, Left Ignore These Dangers July 19, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Mark Skousen On FreedomFest And How To Measure The Whole Economy... July 19, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Quantifying The Quantitative, Or Making Easy The Easing... July 19, 2021 | David Bahnsen

The Gold Standard Means A Rising Standard Of Living... July 19, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

Book Review: Brian Domitrovic Reveals The Monetary Genius Of Arthur Laffer... July 19, 2021 | John Tamny

Steve Forbes: Time To Worry About Inflation, Not Hyperinflation... July 12, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

UFOs Rescue Biden July 12, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Read This Classical Economist’s 200 Year Old Warning About Paper Money... July 12, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

How Central Banks Murdered The Markets July 12, 2021 | Michael Pento

Everything There Is To Know About The Stock Market... July 12, 2021 | David Bahnsen

AT&T CEO: We’re Ill Equipped For Politics, And We’re Spending A Lot Of ... July 6, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Internet Bias Distorts National Conversation... July 6, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

The Halfway Point Of 2021 July 6, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.