An Unnecessary Concern About Income Inequality
A concern with income inequality is that the gap between the top 1 percent income earners and the bottom 99 percent has become astronomically wider since the 1970s – increasing by 275 percent from 1979 to 2007.[1] This data indicates the phenomenon described in my previous article, No Longer Operating Under the Original Intent.[2]
In fact “the top 0.01 percent earned 400 times more than the average” income earner in 1915, only 50 times the average in 1970, and up to 250 times the average income in 1998.[3] This means that the income inequality has drastically improved since 100 years ago. But another key is that all income ranges increased – top 99 to 80 percent by 65 percent, the middle 79 to 21 percent by 40 percent, and the bottom 20 percent by 18 percent.[4] This might seem “unfair,” being that top range increased considerably more than the others, but it is expected when analyzed based on the simple math model I discussed here, A Simple Math Model and the Numbers. Additionally, the share of wealth held between the top 1 percent and bottom 99 percent historically over the past century shows that the difference has not changed in the past century, and that the increase since the 1970s is only an adjustment back to what had previously existed.
Another impact which diminishes the income inequality argument is studying the actual purchasing behaviors and purchase prices between the upper income levels and lower income levels. Prices of products more commonly purchased by low-income consumers compared to products purchased by higher-income consumers, have fallen at a higher rate. Therefore, the “real” income of lower-income consumers has had significant improvement. “This means that much of the rise of measured income inequality has been offset by a relative decline in the prices of products that poorer consumers buy.”[5] Americans do not purchase the same products and different products do inflate at different rates. Moreover, products and services that were not available to low-income consumers have become common purchases for them as the prices drops and demand and consumption greatly increases.
For example, in 2003, 70 percent of non-food spending by low-income consumers were products that did not exist in 1994. For the higher-income consumers it was under 50 percent. Also, food inflation rates were substantially higher for high-income consumers compared to low-income consumers as a result of the purchasing behaviors.[6]
The concern of income inequality does not equal the rhetoric we so often hear from the media and politicians. While there are always improvements we can and should make on the economic front, to fully understand where to improve a dive into the historical data can be revealing and helpful.
[1] Peter Wehner and Robert P. Beschel, Jr., Spring 2012, “How to Think about Inequality,” National Affairs, Number 11, p. 96.
[2] Similar data and discussion is given in David R. Henderson, June 2008, “Economic Inequality: Facts, Theory and Significance,” NCPA Policy Report No. 312, (National Center for Policy Analysis: Dallas, TX), p. 1 for specific data since 1970, and the entire report gives an excellent discussion on the overall lack of inequality and actual wealth improvement of most all Americans.
[3] Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, February 2003, “Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998,” (The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. CXVIII, Issue 1), p. 13. See Figure III on page 14 which shows the percent income share of top 0.01 percent and that in 1998 it remained significantly lower than it was in 1913 thru 1915.
[4] Peter Wehner and Robert P. Beschel, Jr., Spring 2012, “How to Think about Inequality,” National Affairs, Number 11, p. 96.
[5] Christian Broda and John Romalis, July 4, 2009, “The Welfare Implications of Rising Price Dispersion,” Working Paper, [http://www.johnromalis.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Draft_v7.pdf], see pp. 2, 8, 13, and 20.
[6] Christian Broda and John Romalis, July 4, 2009, “The Welfare Implications of Rising Price Dispersion,” Working Paper, [http://www.johnromalis.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Draft_v7.pdf], p. 1.
Originally published on Townhall Finance.
Jim Huntzinger began his career as a manufacturing engineer with Aisin Seiki (a Toyota Group company and manufacturer of automotive components) when they transplanted to North America to support Toyota. Over his career he has also researched at length the evolution of manufacturing in the United States with an emphasis on lean’s influence and development. In addition to his research on TWI, he has extensively researched the history of Ford’s Highland Park plant and its direct tie to Toyota’s business model and methods of operation.
Huntzinger is the President and Founder of Lean Frontiers and a graduate from Purdue University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology and received a M.S. in Engineering Management from the Milwaukee School of Engineering. He authored the book, Lean Cost Management: Accounting for Lean by Establishing Flow, was a contributing author to Lean Accounting: Best Practices for Sustainable Integration.
Trending Now on Affluent Christian Investor
Sorry. No data so far.
The Affluent Mix
Biden Oblivious To Illegal Immigration Issues... August 2, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Rob Arnott On Bubbles, Inflation, And Once-In-A-Generation Investment Opportunit... August 2, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

The Federal Reserve’s Massive Theft Of Stability... August 2, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

What To Do About This Difficult Market? August 2, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Letter On The Politicization Of Corporations... July 26, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Peak Of The Fake Bull Market July 26, 2021 | Michael Pento

Woodrow Wilson’s Administrative State vs. Gold... July 26, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

Dividends, Energy, And Crypto July 26, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Whose Side Are You On? July 26, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Media, Left Ignore These Dangers July 19, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Mark Skousen On FreedomFest And How To Measure The Whole Economy... July 19, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Quantifying The Quantitative, Or Making Easy The Easing... July 19, 2021 | David Bahnsen

The Gold Standard Means A Rising Standard Of Living... July 19, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

Book Review: Brian Domitrovic Reveals The Monetary Genius Of Arthur Laffer... July 19, 2021 | John Tamny

Steve Forbes: Time To Worry About Inflation, Not Hyperinflation... July 12, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

UFOs Rescue Biden July 12, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

Read This Classical Economist’s 200 Year Old Warning About Paper Money... July 12, 2021 | Jim Huntzinger

How Central Banks Murdered The Markets July 12, 2021 | Michael Pento

Everything There Is To Know About The Stock Market... July 12, 2021 | David Bahnsen

AT&T CEO: We’re Ill Equipped For Politics, And We’re Spending A Lot Of ... July 6, 2021 | Jerry Bowyer

Internet Bias Distorts National Conversation... July 6, 2021 | Frank Vernuccio

The Halfway Point Of 2021 July 6, 2021 | David Bahnsen

Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.